Renegade Six Pack – Six Notable Hamlets

Richard Burton as Hamlet
Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrby feather

The highly anticipated and sold out run of Benedict Cumberbatch’s Hamlet has finally entered previews at the Barbican Theater in London, and its causing quite a stir among theater professionals and Shakespeare scholars alike. The controversy is all over the choice to open the play with Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, which to be fair is a terribly difficult way to start the play.

One theater critic went so far as to break the tradition of waiting until the official press night to post a review, criticizing the play for starting in this manner. The subsequent uproar caused director Lyndsey Turner to move the speech back to its rightful place in Act III Scene I, which also caused an uproar. Basically, there’s no escaping this Bermuda Triangle of Petty Offenses.

With that being said, early reviews of the rest of the play have been promising, and its always interesting to see new versions of one of Shakespeare’s greatest plays. While some are more traditional – and perhaps all the more compelling for their level of authenticity – others perhaps take their creative license too far. Here are some of the best and worst Hamlets of the stage and  screen.

 

Laurence Olivier (1948)

This is certainly a more restrained, classical interpretation of Hamlet, at least from an acting standpoint. Olivier’s performance as Hamlet is slightly stilted, but that sense of beautiful, doe-eyed, restrained despair comes through brilliantly. The direction of the movie is somewhat unusual and abstract for the time, a testament to Olivier’s modern sensibilities. I’ve always preferred older Olivier, the more nuanced and playful Olivier from those BBC productions of Harold Pinter television plays. No one plays Pinter quite like Olivier. Luckily, Olivier did play a couple Shakespeare roles in his older years, most notably a Granada television production of King Lear (1983) featuring performances by John Hurt, Robert Lindsay, and Brian Cox.

 

Mel Gibson (1990)

This moody period set production of Hamlet was made near the beginning of Mel Gibson’s heyday and released right between Lethal Weapon 2 and 3. Those more familiar with Gibson as he is today may have a hard time picturing him tackling anything as heavy as Hamlet, but this was the man who would go on to both star in and direct movies like The Man Without a Face and Braveheart – and man who would go on to win Academy Awards. Yes, there was a time when Mel Gibson was as much a movie star as the Tom’s, Hanks and Cruise. Still, its not a half bad movie, and Gibson’s Hamlet is eminently watchable as he adds a touch of crazed charm reminiscent of Martin Riggs. The film also boasts a stellar cast featuring Glenn Close as Gertrude, Helena Bonham Carter as Ophelia, Alan Bates as Claudius, and Ian Holm as Polonius. 

 

Ethan Hawke (2000)

Although this 2000 version of the play, set in New York City amid a violent corporate takeover, isn’t particularly good and is in many ways obnoxious and plodding, you’d be hard pressed to find a more eclectic casting. Hawke plays the pretentious and angsty art student Hamlet who suspects his Uncle Claudius (a smarmy Kyle MacLachlan) of murdering his father to become CEO of the Denmark Corporation. Bill Murray brilliantly plays the cliched Polonius while Julia Stiles plays Ophelia and Casey Affleck makes a turn as corporate competitor Fortinbras. This adaptation, while perhaps edgy and timely at its release, is now incredibly dated and tedious.

 

Kenneth Branagh (1996)

I find Branagh to be a brilliant actor (definitely watch Wallander) but a clunky and overblown director. If his middling turn in the Marvel Universe as director for Thor is anything to go by, he has a fantastic sense of the epic and of the gaudiness of classical myth and literature, but a bit too ambitious and disorganized in his execution. This is most apparent in Branagh’s adaptation of Hamlet, which is tedious and, clocking in at an ungodly 242 minutes, unbearably long. The production itself is opulent to say the least, with palatial sets and elaborate Edwardian costumes. The film also benefits from an incredible cast, including Kate Winslet as Ophelia, Derek Jacobi as Claudius, Judi Dench as Hecuba, Robin Williams as Osric, Billy Crystal as the Gravedigger, Simon Russell Beale, Julie Christie, Timothy Spall, Charlton Heston, John Gielgud, and Jack Lemmon.

 

David Tennant (2009)

Where else are you going to see Captain Picard and the Doctor together (aside from this, I mean)? Not only does this version star two of the best actors in Britain right now, but the play’s run was a dream for both sci-fi and Shakespeare geeks alike. The lavish and vibrant production features brilliant performances and walks the delicate line between traditional and contemporary. While Tennant’s Hamlet is charming and captivating, Patrick Stewart’s Claudius is transcendent – and rightly should be considering it is his second time playing the role (the first in the 1980 Derek Jacobi production of Hamlet). The film of this production came out not long after David Tennant had made his heartbreaking exit from Doctor Who and considering Hamlet et al die at the end its taken me a good long while to even take a look at the film. Believe me, the heartbreak is worth it.

 

Richard Burton (1964)

This was the production that changed Hamlet forever. Up until this Broadway run of the John Gielgud directed play starring Richard Burton, Hamlet had been steeped in tradition and period costumes. The cast wore what amounted to rehearsal clothes in a sparse rehearsal space, allowing for free movement and unhindered expression, with no distractions of costume or scenery to detract from the action of the play. Burton plays a legendary Hamlet – mercurial, intelligent, humorous, and deeply emotional. For a long time this performance was thought to be lost until a VHS copy was found among Burton’s belongings after his death. Legend has it that Burton and Peter O’Toole made an agreement on the set of Becket to each star in a production of Hamlet, one directed by Laurence Olivier and the other directed by Gielgud, one in London and one in New York. A coin toss determined the respective directors and locations and the rest is history.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblrby feather

About the Author

Bethany Lewis
My cinema education started when, at three years old, Charlie Chaplin's "The Gold Rush" became my earliest memory of cinema. Since then, I've been obsessed with film and television, learning more about it, analyzing it, researching it, and experiencing different kinds of it. After getting my BA in Theater, I went on to get my MFA in Film Studies. I now spend my free time watching and writing about movies.
  • Michelle Gonrey

    The latest version is sheer perfection. Not unexpectedly Cumberbatch provides a superlative Hamlet with great sensitivity in his reading of the part and brings amazing presence and physicality. This is going to be the version people will still be talking about in years to come and use as the yardstick of success. Ciaran Hinds is an excellent Claudius and while the rest of the cast don’t quite shine the way these two do, it is very much an ensemble piece and there is no effort to foreground Cumberbatch beyond Hamlet’s central role in the play. It was noticable in the 10 minute standing ovation at the performance I attended that Cumberbatch was reluctant to take any separate bow and had to be persuaded by the company to do so. While the acting is transcendent and they may as well already carve both Cumberbatch’s and Hinds’ names on next year’s Olivier awards, it is the set and staging which marks out this production as one of the greatest seen on the London stage for many a year. The acting is already swoon worthy but the set designer has taken things to another level. Fortunately, the actors are able to inhabit the vast stage, with Cumberbatch in particular speaking clearly and beautifully throughout while pacing the entire set.
    I fully expect the reviews to be unanimously favourable and the stray comment on social media from those in the theatrical know already shows the support which Lyndsey Turner and Cumberbatch are being given in the light of the malicious campaign against the production mounted by The Times. It will be very pleasing for them when the paper’s proper theatre critic stands up with the other reviewers to award this full stars. Simply one of the greatest theatrical experiences of the last few years. For those not lucky enough to see this live, I strongly recommend that you rush out to book cinema showings. When the reviews come out next week, there will be a rush to the box office. It is unlikely there will be a DVD of the production given the strong views of the director and star about the need to experience this production ‘live’.

Optimization WordPress Plugins & Solutions by W3 EDGE
Google